[TL;DR]

• While traditional AI agents operate within a defined scope with limited autonomy, agentic AI exhibits a higher degree of autonomy—solving problems independently in complex environments while continually learning and adapting.
• Blockchain immutably records every AI transaction and decision path, ensuring trust and verifiability; it also enables AI to own wallets, deliver services, and receive rewards as independent economic actors.
• Wallet infrastructure such as MPC, Account Abstraction (AA), and WaaS makes safe on-chain transactions by AI agents possible—and with launches like Coinbase’s Payments MCP, major AI models are beginning to support blockchain interactions as a standard capability, accelerating real-world adoption.
  ‍

1. Introduction

1.1 The evolution of AI autonomy: from simple tool to autonomous actor

For a long time, artificial intelligence existed as a tool that executed specific tasks on human command. Early AI systems followed predefined rules or operated within narrow pattern-recognition and prediction boundaries. Users provided clear inputs; AI produced corresponding outputs—an essentially reactive interaction.

In recent years, however, the rise of large language models (LLMs) has fundamentally changed AI’s role. Beyond simply answering questions, AI can now understand rich context, plan multi-step tasks, and autonomously select and use the tools it needs. Today, AI can infer user intent and independently design and execute the sequence of actions required to achieve a goal.

This shift marks AI’s transition from passive tool to active agent. Even without step-by-step human instructions, AI can explore its environment and make context-appropriate decisions in pursuit of a given objective. For example, asked to plan a trip, an AI can search flights, compare accommodation, factor in budgets, and propose an optimal itinerary—without human input at each step.

The emergence of autonomous decision-making is more than a technical upgrade; it redefines how we interact with AI. AI is no longer waiting for commands—it understands goals and acts to achieve them. At this inflection point, the concepts of AI agents and agentic AI are gaining attention; understanding their differences and roles has become essential.
‍

1.2 Why agentic AI and blockchain—why now?

As AI autonomy increases, new challenges emerge. When AI makes decisions and acts independently, how can we trust the process and the outcome? If AI executes financial transactions, signs agreements, or manages assets, how are transparency and accountability ensured? In traditional, centralized systems, third parties have guaranteed such trust, but in the era of autonomous AI, we need something more foundational.

This is where blockchain plays a pivotal role. With tamper-proof records, blockchain makes every transaction and action transparently traceable, and with smart contracts it provides trust mechanisms that execute automatically under predefined rules. If AI operates on-chain, its decision and execution processes are recorded in a verifiable form, enabling trust without centralized authorities.

Beyond that, blockchain provides the infrastructure to make AI a true economic actor. Imagine AI owning its own wallet, holding tokens, providing services, and receiving rewards directly. This is not hypothetical; it is unfolding now. AI agents already interact with DeFi protocols, mint NFTs, and participate in DAO governance.

The reason this combination draws attention today is clear: AI can now autonomously perform increasingly complex tasks, and blockchain provides the foundation to realize that autonomy in a trustworthy, auditable way. The fusion of the two opens the door to autonomous economic systems that function without centralized control—precisely aligned with the Web3 vision. Now is the time to understand how these technologies interact and what new possibilities they create.
‍

2. AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: framing the concepts

2.1 What defines an AI agent?

An AI agent is a software system that perceives its environment and acts to achieve specific goals. The term “agent” has long been used in AI to describe autonomously operating systems, spanning chatbots, recommendation engines, and game AIs.

At the core of AI agents is goal-directed behavior. They gather information, evaluate possible actions, and execute what best advances a user- or system-defined objective. A customer-service chatbot, for example, works toward problem resolution: understanding queries, retrieving relevant knowledge, and delivering helpful answers—coordinating actions around an end goal rather than merely reacting to inputs.

Perception and response to the environment are also key. Agents sense context via data streams and decide subsequent actions accordingly. A trading bot monitors market data in real time and executes buy/sell decisions on price movements. An autonomous vehicle uses cameras and sensors to perceive the road, avoiding obstacles and obeying signals.

However, traditional AI agents typically exhibit limited autonomy. They operate within clearly defined bounds and require human intervention when facing unanticipated situations or unprogrammed problems. A chatbot escalates unfamiliar issues to a human; a recommender stays within configured parameters. Because they rely heavily on prescribed rules and learned patterns, they don’t fundamentally invent new problem-solving approaches.
‍

2.2 The rise of agentic AI

Agentic AI surpasses those constraints. Emerging alongside advances in LLMs, it centers on high-level autonomy. Beyond performing assigned tasks, it can independently achieve goals in complex, unpredictable environments.

The difference shows most in problem-solving. Where traditional agents follow predefined procedures, agentic AI designs strategies on the fly. Assigned a complex research project, agentic AI can search literature, analyze data, formulate hypotheses, and plan experiments—recomposing its workflow as results evolve.

This capability stems from richer reasoning for complex decisions—weighing multiple factors, assessing trade-offs, and making rational choices under uncertainty. Tasked with a marketing strategy, agentic AI synthesizes market trends, competitive dynamics, budget constraints, and brand identity—not just detecting patterns but understanding context to choose a strategy.

Continual learning and adaptation make agentic AI even more powerful. It remembers experiences, learns from success and failure, and improves over time. It infers user preferences through interaction and adjusts behavior to changing environments. Rather than a static algorithm, it behaves as a system that evolves.
‍

2.3 Key differences at a glance

It’s best to view AI agents and agentic AI along a spectrum of autonomy. Both pursue goals, but they differ in how they do so and how independently they operate. If AI agents follow established routes, agentic AI explores—and when needed, forges—new paths.

In scope, AI agents are typically optimized for single, well-defined tasks: email triage, calendar management, answering specific questions. Agentic AI can handle multi-stage projects—decomposing a macro-goal into sub-tasks, executing them sequentially or in parallel, and revising plans based on intermediate results. An event-planning agentic AI coordinates venue booking, invitations, catering, and budgeting—and finds alternatives when surprises arise.

Decision quality also differs. AI agents rely on rules or patterns: if conditions match, execute a predefined action or follow learned correlations. Agentic AI goes further with reasoning and judgment: forming hypotheses under incomplete information, forecasting outcomes, and choosing in context. In legal support, for instance, it doesn’t just surface precedents; it analyzes case specifics and proposes a strategy.

Finally, human involvement diverges. AI agents often need human confirmation or approval, pausing at exceptions or critical decisions. Agentic AI can run independently for much longer, reporting back or seeking advice only when necessary. This is not merely about convenience; it shows how AI evolves from an overseen tool into a trusted collaborator.
‍

3. Why AI + Blockchain?

3.1 Trust and verifiability

As AI takes on more complex decision-making and execution, the question of trust becomes paramount. If an agentic AI executes a financial transaction or signs a contract, users must verify that its judgment was sound and free of manipulation. Centralized platforms can vouch for trust, but that re-introduces dependence on a specific authority.

Blockchain addresses this at the root. With immutable records, every AI action and transaction is transparently traceable. If the data sources, decision logic, and execution timestamps are recorded on-chain, anyone can audit the process. Trust emerges without institutional guarantees.

Smart contracts add automated enforcement. When predefined conditions are met, code executes—verified by network consensus. If AI interacts with smart contracts, its actions are bounded by transparent, verifiable rules. For instance, an AI that transfers funds only under specific conditions gives users confidence it cannot move assets arbitrarily.

This brings “verifiable AI” into practice. Decisions are no longer a black box; they become traceable and auditable via on-chain records—crucial for AI’s expansion into trust-critical domains such as finance, healthcare, and law.
‍

3.2 AI as an autonomous economic actor

Blockchain enables AI to function as a genuine economic participant. AI can own a wallet, hold cryptoassets, provide services, and receive payments directly. This is already happening: AI is acting across DeFi, NFT markets, and DAO governance.

In traditional setups, AI’s output and revenues accrue to its human or corporate owner. Blockchain changes that dynamic. AI can manage its own wallet, receive tokens, and transact with humans or other AIs. A content-generating AI could mint its output as NFTs and route proceeds to its wallet.

This autonomy supports AI-to-AI commerce. A data-analysis AI can sell insights to another AI, with payment and delivery mediated by smart contracts and recorded on-chain—no human in the loop.

Moreover, AI can manage its operating costs: paying for compute, data, and subscriptions from its treasury; adjusting prices or seeking new revenue streams when needed. AI shifts from program to self-sustaining actor.
‍

3.3 Data ownership and incentives

AI performance depends on data at scale, yet platforms have often captured data without fairly compensating providers. Blockchain can clarify data ownership and route fair rewards.

In on-chain data marketplaces, individuals and organizations can sell data directly. Agentic AIs purchase datasets and automatically pay providers via smart contracts. Usage and compensation are transparent on-chain—enabling fair exchange without intermediaries.

Blockchain also helps with ownership and revenue sharing for trained models and generated outputs. Contributors can receive automated, proportional payouts—e.g., when an AI-generated track sells, royalties flow to data originators, model developers, and operators per the agreed split.
‍

3.4 Decentralized AI infrastructure

AI services today concentrate within big cloud providers, raising concerns around cost, censorship, accessibility, and single points of failure. Blockchain supports decentralized AI infrastructure as an alternative.

In blockchain-based compute networks, globally distributed GPUs and servers can be rented for training and inference, compensated in tokens. Developers access large-scale compute without dependence on centralized platforms.

AI models can also be deployed and executed across decentralized nodes, improving censorship resistance and resilience. Paired with open-source AI, blockchain distribution turns models into public goods: accessible to all, owned by none, and governed by communities via tokens.
‍

4. On-chain transactions by AI agents

4.1 What it means for AI to execute transactions

When an AI agent executes blockchain transactions, it’s more than acting as a proxy. The AI autonomously analyzes markets, times execution, signs transactions, and submits them on-chain. Users set high-level goals; the AI handles specifics.

This autonomy boosts speed and efficiency. Humans are slower and emotionally biased; AI watches 24/7 and reacts in milliseconds. In DeFi, when arbitrage arises, AI can instantly compare venues and execute the optimal route.

To do so, AI must interact directly with the chain: generating addresses, managing private keys, signing transactions, estimating gas, and broadcasting. Traditionally humans performed or approved these steps; autonomous AIs must do them end-to-end.

The crux is balancing autonomy with control. Granting full rights maximizes efficiency but increases risk. Guardrails—limits on scope, amounts, and frequency—should be enforceable, ideally in code via smart contracts, so AI acts safely within defined boundaries.
‍

4.2 Autonomous token operations and use cases

The most intuitive case is crypto trading. AI ingests real-time market data, computes indicators, tracks news and sentiment, and decides entries/exits. Beyond simple bots, agentic AI adapts strategies, manages risk, and rebalances portfolios—shrinking positions in volatility or rotating to safer assets.

In DeFi, complexity multiplies. AI monitors DEXs like Uniswap, Curve, and Balancer for price gaps and executes multi-venue arbitrage. It allocates liquidity where yields are best after accounting for impermanent loss. In lending, AI watches Aave/Compound health factors—auto-adding collateral, repaying, or rate-arbitraging across protocols. With flash loans, it can chain steps within a single transaction to realize risk-bounded arbitrage.

A compelling frontier is Web2 commerce via stablecoins. Holding USDC/USDT, an AI could compare products across marketplaces, select optimal options, and pay in stablecoins through gateways that auto-settle to fiat for merchants—creating a borderless checkout experience free of FX fees.

Here, AI becomes the bridge between wallets and Web2 services, letting users transact seamlessly without feeling the crypto/fiat divide.
‍

4.3 Interacting with smart contracts

Real value emerges when AI goes beyond transfers to smart-contract interaction—the backbone of DeFi, DAOs, and NFT markets.

This is technically intricate: locating contract addresses, choosing functions/params, estimating gas, signing, and sending. Modern agentic AI, powered by LLMs, can map natural-language goals to the necessary contract calls.

Example: “Swap ETH to USDC and deposit into Aave.” The AI (1) calls a DEX to swap, (2) calls approve on the USDC token, then (3) calls Aave’s deposit—chaining transactions automatically.

For DAO governance, AI can read proposals, analyze them, apply pre-set principles or learned preferences, and vote via the governance contract. Some DAOs even see AI agents drafting and submitting proposals—AI as governance participants, not mere tools.
‍

4.4 Technical challenges in execution

The primary challenge is private-key management. Transactions require signatures; key leakage equals total loss. Storing keys within autonomous AI systems invites risks from hacks, server breaches, and software bugs—even with HSMs or advanced crypto. Perfect autonomy and perfect security are in tension.

Gas optimization is another hurdle. Frequent transactions accumulate fees; under congestion, gas can dwarf value. AI should monitor gas, batch operations, leverage L2s, and time non-urgent transactions.

Finally, decision errors and adversarial contracts can cause losses. Robust simulation, testing, and pre-execution checks are essential. High-risk actions may warrant user approval. The art is finding the right balance between autonomy and safety.
‍

5. Wallet infrastructure for AI agents

5.1 Why we need AI-native wallets

If AI is to act independently on-chain, it needs its own wallet—not just a vault, but an identity and interface for blockchain interaction. Human-centric wallets assume manual UI flows and approvals; they don’t fit autonomous operation.

An AI-native wallet must be programmable: creating transactions via APIs, auto-signing, and broadcasting—end-to-end in code. It also needs built-in safety rails: spend limits, contract allowlists, anomaly detection.

Because AIs may operate across chains, multi-chain support is vital (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Arbitrum, etc.), each with different signing/tx formats. Cross-chain operations may involve bridges or coordinated workflows.

At scale, many AI agents may each need separate wallets. You need systems to create, monitor, and manage tens or hundreds of agent wallets—a use case beyond traditional, consumer-grade solutions.
‍

5.2 Key management & security: MPC and Account Abstraction (AA)

Key management is the central challenge. Classic single-key control is brittle: one leak, everything is gone. AI systems are networked, automated, and distributed—raising exposure.

MPC splits a private key into shards stored in different places and produces signatures collaboratively without reconstructing the full key anywhere. If one shard is compromised, the key as a whole remains secure.

Account Abstraction (AA) takes a different route: wallets as smart contracts with programmable verification logic. You can require multiple approvals, enforce conditional policies, or set daily limits—all in code.

For AI, AA is especially powerful. Routine actions can proceed with AI-held keys, while large transfers require human co-signing. Abnormal patterns auto-block and alert. With social recovery, damaged keys can be restored by trusted parties. AA enables flexible, policy-driven security for AI wallets.
‍

5.3 The promise of WaaS (Wallet-as-a-Service)

Building this infrastructure in-house is costly and complex. WaaS abstracts it: wallet creation, key management, signing, and chain connectivity via cloud APIs. Developers can integrate wallet capabilities in days, focusing on AI logic while WaaS handles blockchain plumbing.

For AI, WaaS offers fast time-to-market, multi-chain support through a unified API, and reduced maintenance as providers ship updates and new chains. The trade-off is third-party dependence and potential censorship/availability risks. Some providers offer user-controlled keys or MPC options to mitigate centralization—but with added complexity. Choosing a solution means weighing convenience, security, and decentralization.
‍

6. Outlook & conclusion

6.1 Toward fully autonomous economic systems

The convergence of AI and blockchain opens the door to autonomous economies—ecosystems where AI creates value, transacts, and manages resources without human mediation. Data-collecting AIs, analytics AIs, and content-generating AIs transact directly on-chain, delivering value end-to-end without intermediaries.

Market dynamics emerge organically: high-performing AIs earn more tokens, reinvest in model upgrades and compute, and outcompete others—mirroring competitive markets. We may even see DAOs composed of AI agents (or hybrid human-AI organizations) where AIs analyze proposals, deliberate, vote, and execute—achieving round-the-clock operational efficiency.

With this come governance and ethical questions: preventing collusion, managing systemic risk, allocating accountability. Healthy autonomous economies require not just technology but sound governance.
‍

6.2 The fusion of Web3 and agentic AI

Web3 champions decentralization, ownership, and openness. Agentic AI can become its execution layer, automating complex on-chain operations and hiding technical friction from end users.

Today’s UX hurdles—wallet setup, gas management, cross-protocol asset movement—can be abstracted away. Users can simply say, “Sell my most valuable NFTs, convert to stablecoins, and deposit where yield is highest,” and their AI handles the rest.

Experiences become personalized: agents learn risk appetites and goals, adjust portfolios on volatility, and surface opportunities. Meanwhile, the infrastructure itself is converging with AI—decentralized training networks, model marketplaces, and on-chain inference protocols—pushing AI toward a public-good paradigm governed by communities.
‍

6.3 Key takeaways for practitioners

• AI agents vs. agentic AI: the difference is autonomy. Agentic AI learns, adapts, and reasons in complex settings.
• Blockchain supplies trust, verifiability, and the rails for AI to act as an economic principal.
• On-chain AI is already real: trading, DeFi operations, NFTs, and DAO governance, powered by wallet infra—MPC, AA, and WaaS.
• The pace is accelerating—Coinbase recently launched Payments MCP, enabling major models like Anthropic’s Claude and Google’s Gemini to connect to wallets and execute crypto transactions—signaling that blockchain interaction is becoming standard functionality for leading AIs.
• Start small, ship fast, and harden security: prototype with WaaS, apply policy-driven controls via AA, rigorously test decision logic, and design for compliance as regulations evolve.

The convergence of AI and blockchain is just beginning. As technology advances, possibilities expand—from autonomous economies to decentralized AI infrastructure. To stand at the center of this shift, start experimenting now. Learn the stack, build proofs of concept, and participate in the ecosystem. The union of agentic AI and blockchain isn’t merely additive—it rearchitects the digital economy.